Kevin Carmichael: The G20 was supposed to bring stability. It gets harder with each passing year to say the group has lived up to its promise

Article content

Maybe this is what you get for creating international institutions on the back of an envelope.

Advertisement

Article content

Canadian Paul Martin and American Lawrence Summers in the spring of 1999 decided the world’s legacy powers and emerging economies such as China and Brazil needed a place to talk. The previous five years had featured one financial crisis after another: Mexico, Southeast Asia, Russia.

The pair dreamed up the roster of what would become the G20 on the back of a brown manilla envelope in Summers’ office in Washington on April 27, 1999, the Globe and Mail reported in 2010 ahead of the Toronto G20 Summit, and in the immediate aftermath of yet another financial crisis, albeit one whose origins were in the rich world.

The G20 was supposed to bring stability. But it gets harder with each passing year to say the group has lived up to its promise. It did OK in coordinating the global response to the Great Recession, but, frankly, it hasn’t done much since. Politics keeps getting in the way.

Advertisement

Article content

Maybe a group created in the 1990s, when history was supposedly over, was doomed from the start. Five days into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it feels naive to think that a group including the United States, China, Russia, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Turkey would ever have been able to accomplish much.

Over the weekend, the U.S., the European members of the G20 and Canada imposed “restrictive measures” that they said would stop Russia’s central bank from “deploying its international reserves in ways that undermine the impacts of our sanctions.” European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the point on Feb. 27, stating that the commission will “ban the transactions of Russia’s central bank and freeze all its assets, to prevent it from financing (Vladimir) Putin’s war.”

Advertisement

Article content

The founders of a group created in the aftermath of a ruble crisis have now triggered one. The Russian currency collapsed by some 40 per cent, which is more than during the country’s financial crisis in 1998, according to Karl Schamotta, chief market strategist at Cambridge Mercantile Corp.

Russia’s central bank was forced to resort to extreme measures. It would have preferred to use its vast reserves to buy dollars and euros, thus protecting the exchange rate in a way that few Russians would have noticed. Instead, it raised its benchmark interest rate to 20 per cent from 9.5 per cent to offset the risk of holding rubles at a moment when the Western powers appear intent on expelling Russia from the global financial system they control via the regulatory power of Washington, London and Brussels.

Advertisement

Article content

The sanctions on the Russian central bank will “largely prevent the use of reserves in defending the exchange rate on international markets, and is likely to result in a cascading freeze in liquidity conditions as financial institutions play a game of “hot potato” with ruble transactions,” Schamotta said in a note to his clients. “We expect Argentina-style currency controls to be imposed in the coming days, with an official exchange rate used for domestic transactions, while rates available on international markets are far lower.”

Canada is a small player in this scene. “The Bank of Canada does not hold any of the Russian central bank’s reserves, nor does it transact with any Russian banks,” spokesman Paul Badertscher said in an email. “The Bank of Canada has also notified the Russian central bank that we will not facilitate any transactions for them.”

Advertisement

Article content

But what looks like the death of the G20 as a serious global body must be a disappointment to the globalists in Ottawa who thought they had helped create something special. It looked that way for a little while. Then history got in the way, forcing the group to choose sides. Now they are fanning flames rather than dousing them.

“While the (measures imposed on Russia’s central bank are) likely to isolate the country further and put pressure on the Putin regime, it also represents a human tragedy, with Russian households set to experience a devastating loss in purchasing power — a loss unequaled since the fall of the Soviet Union,” Schamotta said.

• Email: kcarmichael@postmedia.com | Twitter: carmichaelkevin

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.




Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the West’s response, signals the end of Canada’s hopes for the G20

2022-02-28 20:28:14

Leave a Reply

Pantère Group

Infinity Building
Amstelveenseweg 500
1081 KL Amsterdam, Netherlands

E: Info@pantheregroup.com